Consortia for Advocacy in Rural Health Enhancement
Partner with us
HomeImpactHow We Measure
Impact · Method

How we measure

Six metrics, each with a definition and a stated limit.

The metrics

Definitions matter more than values

MetricDefinitionLimit
CoverageScreened as a proportion of the rollAbsence is not refusal; we record them separately
Findings rateCoded findings per hundred screened, by categoryA screening cohort is not a population sample
Referrals raisedReferrals generated per hundred screenedDepends on clinical threshold, which varies
Referrals closedReferrals with a confirmed outcomeUnknown outcomes are reported as unknown, not assumed
Card issueCards personalised and handed overIssued is not the same as retained
Repeat participationBeneficiaries returning in a later cycleOnly meaningful from the second cycle onwards
The funnel

What we publish, stage by stage

The funnel we publishScreened1,000Findings recorded340Referred120Attendedreported, never assumedOutcome knownreported, never assumedCounts shown are structural placeholders. Attendance and outcome are reported as unknown where unknown.
Screened, findings, referred, attended, outcome known
Coverage

Why the denominator is reported, not just the count

Why the denominator is reported, not just the count1,000on the rollScreened — 82%820 childrenAbsent on the day — 11%110 childrenDeclined by parent — 7%70 childrenIllustrative structure only. Actual figures are published per programme cycle.Screened-negative and not-screened are never merged.
Coverage structure — illustrative, not a claimed result
The number we watch most

The gap between raised and closed

This is the honest measure

Any programme can raise referrals. The proportion that reach a confirmed outcome is what distinguishes a health service from a screening exercise, and it is the number we report first.

See what a partner receives.

The report structure.